However, the memoirs of Arif Cemil Denker (to be discussed later), which Akçam uses as his source, do not support such an assertion, but only mention that the “relocation” of Armenians was decided without implying any destructive designs.
Akçam further maintains that some officials who opposed the govement’s policy in this regard were removed from office. He notes, for instance, that Reşit Pasha, the goveor of Kastamonu province, was removed because he opposed the deportations within his province (p. However, it is noteworthy that, even after the removal of Goveor Reşit Pasha, the Interior Ministry in several communiqués dispatched to the province still instructed the local authorities to not deport the Armenians in Kastamonu.
At present, the Armenians there will not be relocated. ” 17 Akçam argues that the goveors who were removed from office later testified before the “Commission on the Investigation of Evil Acts,” as well as the post-war military tribunals, that they were removed because of their opposition to the deportations. As an example, Akçam cites how “Mazhar Bey,” the former goveor of Ankara, explained his case (p.
Dissertation Writing Regulations: Do You Know The Essential Recommendations In Creating A Wonderful Dissertation? www.DissertationsWritingServices.com
However, the pronouncement quoted by Akçam was not made by Mazhar himself, neither to the mentioned commission nor to the post-war tribunals, but was instead attributed to Mazhar Bey by a person named Mehmet Radi. 18 Akçam contends that, along with the CUP’s responsible secretaries, CUP member Bahaettin Şakir himself also “traveled around the easte provinces and met with the goveors, sub-goveors and other persons” and “informed them of the [genocide] decision of the CUP’s Central Committee” (p. Unfortunately, this is one of the many instances in the book where facts are confused by Akçam’s gloss. The memoir of Hüseyin Cahit Yalçın, which Akcam cites as his source, does not mention any decision by the CUP Central Committee at all, but relates that Bahaettin Şakir seemed to “have traveled around the easte provinces and met with the goveors, sub-goveors and other persons, and, by exceeding the limits of Searching for a premium quality posting services visit dissertationswritingservices.com/best-dissertation/ will give you the most suitable producing support his authority, presented his personal thoughts as if they were the decision and the wish of the CUP and the Central Committe” 19 (italics added). Akçam also cites passages from several sources in order to demonstrate the direct responsibility of state officials in the killings, but these are used selectively.
Content Creation Approach – Make An Define To Help Make Article Composing Significantly Less Complicated DissertationsWritingServices.COM
He leaves out information in the sources that does not coincide with his thesis. For instance, he quotes from a speech made by Mehmet Emin Bey, the deputy for Trabzon, during the discussions in the Ottoman Parliament in which Mehmet Emin states that he personally witnessed that the prefect of Ordu “loaded a boat with the Armenians on the pretext of sending them to Samsun, and then had them tipped into the sea” (p. Akçam then goes on to quote Mehmet Emin Bey’s subsequent remarks but omits a relevant part: “As soon as I arrived here [İstanbul] I told what I witnessed to the minister of the interior [Talat Pasha].
Ingredients Of Simple Dissertation Creating DissertationsWritingServices�
Thereafter, they sent an inspector and dismissed the prefect [of Ordu]. They put him on trial. ” 20 Akçam asserts that the Ottoman Interior Ministry remained unmoved by the news of the Armenian massacres (p.
He further believes that these were written merely to placate foreign ambassadors.